Jump to content

AffectedArc07

Host
  • Posts

    873
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    61

Posts posted by AffectedArc07

  1. Hello

     

    Following on from my previous post, here is a PDF of stats I queried from the past year, as well as other tidbits. This also includes some awards which will be mirrored here:


    Most violent award: @Charliminator

    Most likely to die award: @MisterMan

    Most connections award: @ItsMarmite

    Go touch grass (all players): @ItsMarmite

    Go touch grass (admins): @Meow19


    Discuss in this thread: https://www.paradisestation.org/forum/topic/22060-2021-in-review-discussion-thread/


    Edit: Attachment doesn't work. Use https://www.paradisestation.org/aastuff/2021_in_review.pdf

     

    • Like 4
    • eyes 1
    • fastparrot 3
  2. Posting on behalf of fox

     

    Quote

    Fox states: This was discussed before, and thoroughly buried. We're not going to be implementing something like this. It's not worth the effort time, or resources, nor are we opening the floodgates for every idiosyncratic customization of what may HYPOTHETICALLY bother players. After all, there's more fears than just arachnophobia.

     

  3. 58 minutes ago, Generaldonothing said:

    Simplebots are often fine for the server

    You clearly don't know anything about simple bots.

     

    Their pathfinding process is one of the most expensive systems in the entire game (yes, beating out atmospherics), and given that bot pathing is not regulated by the MC, just 30 bots total is enough to bring the server to its knees.

     

    Do not encourage levels of 80 simple bots or more. You will be job banned.

    I have done this before and will gladly do it again. 

  4. 47 minutes ago, destinycall said:

    but was it ever actually tried in-game?

    I cannot speak on behalf of leadership but I can tell you an answer here.

     

    "Has it been tried?"

    No, because it doesn't need to be, since we already disagree with it. Why would we push for something that none of us agree with? 

    disclaimer: none in this context is going off of a sample from when this was discussed. Opinions subject to change. Ts and Cs apply.

  5. 20 minutes ago, Fourwindbadger said:

    and it might be a real need since more and more people come up with the suggestion to make an 'intern like' title

    More people talking doesn't mean more of a need of something.

     

    Take the IPC box argument. That gets bought up multiple times each month, and its the same result each time.

    (For those unaware, the result is "No, we are not giving IPCs a full welder and cable coil on roundstart)

  6. 11 hours ago, procdrone said:

    this idea was thoroughly considered in the past, the usual consensus was that people would pick on these people and take advantage of them (in case of antag etc) which wouldn't be much help to their learning experience at all.

    This

     

    This is why it has been shot down every time it got suggested in the past. The fuckwit antags will target the people with intern, especially if its security. It will also no doubt lead to "I want someone experienced, not an intern". 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use