Jump to content

FreeStylaLT

Retired Admins
  • Posts

    1,242
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by FreeStylaLT

  1.  

    you know if you're basing yourself so heavily on a video game character why don't you base the lore off of them, too

     

     

     

    I mean it's the whole point of roleplaying as a specific, already-written and defined individual, isn't it

     

  2.  

    but my monitor has 1080p resolution which is objectively better than 720p, which is objectively better than 480p and so on. I can't exactly say that 64x64 mode with 15x15 objectively looks better overall than stretch to fit with 17x17, since that is up to personal preference, but sprites definitely don't look how they're exactly supposed to in that mode, which I do notice and think it looks ugly compared to 64x64.

     

    I don't see why you would try and limit people with the better resolutions by giving them stretched and disfigured sprites to look at instead of what was intended.

     

  3. Well, it's a good thing the game is set over 550 years into the future where we can write off such realism discrepancies as having been addressed over the 500 years of technological improvement, if your main argument is based around how real life 2015 chainsaws work..

  4. I don't know why it reflects projectiles, but I am fine with the rest of its features, since, you really shouldn't be able to "outrobust" someone with a fucking chainsaw, if you charge someone with a chainsaw because you want to be some sort of hero, then you will die like one, since that's not what you should be doing when facing a maniac with one.

  5. I think that letting people play what they want is the way to go, one could argue that a distinction between canine and feline was unnecessary, but that does not warrant throwing away the hard work of spriting and coding the species. The issues people have are with the players or the way they play, not the species itself. There is no point in throwing away the car because the driver is shit.

  6.  

    What's exactly wrong with having a more better version of an instant stun taser Security has? All the reasons you listed were regarding the lethality of the gun, which is clearly not it's main intention, since it's made to be a stun weapon first, and an unreliable lethal weapon second.

     

    EDIT: From the looks of it you just want the Blueshield to gain access to lethals from the get-go, which isn't something that was ever intended, hence the rubber bullets. Blueshield isn't some special head or Command, they're Security just like any officer, just meant to stick around the heads. Their way of dealing with threats should be identical to those Sec uses, which are non-lethal. If Red Alert is called, the Blueshield should be going to the armory to ask for an E-Gun just like any other officer, not whipping out their e-gun and setting it to kill.

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use