Jump to content

Spartan

Members
  • Posts

    350
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Spartan

  1. 1 hour ago, Gabe said:

    I would suggest a few things. Firstly, scrutinise mistakes when they are made, the more they are ignored the less the admin will learn. I also suggest that admins be left to deal with their own critics, as currently when someone's actions are called into question it gets the entire staff team up in arms - much like this thread, apart from here I didn't even mention specific events or names at first. Adding onto this last point quickly, in admin complaint threads it seems any admin is allowed to give their opinion on the matter, but this does not apply to any player, as "non-relevant" posts will be removed. Finally, I suggest being more open about any and all disciplinary actions which staff members receive. 

    To your points.

    1. If something can be conceived as a mistake, it is usually discussed within our private chat to death. We're not twirling out 1800s moustaches with feet in the past, we review and discuss these decisions and policy. We're not a static entity, we do comb over where we can make changes. Obviously, bigger policy changes take more time, but we're hardly ignoring anything.
    2. If somebody wishes to give an admin critique in a public thread, expecting nobody else but the admin in question to reply to it is an extremely tall order. We have a section for that, and PM if you don't wish to use that channel to provide feedback. Otherwise, expect people to reply.
    3. I'm not sure what you mean in regards to the Admin Complaints. We only reply if we have something to add generally, which again, players who have relevant and evidence adding posts can do as well. You generally just see admins doing it more however as we have access to logs and such that players do not; even so, most replies to Admin Complaints are by Heads.
    4. Disciplinary action, if any is taken due to a complaint and such, is generally mentioned in the complaint. There's no need for anything like a thread or whatever to shame the administration, like we don't have a public thread to shame any players we bwoink.

    Overall to the point of the thread; people will say we have bias towards antags and people will say we have bias towards sec. We deal with these complaints like it's a revolving door, differently sided every other week. Important things to remember is that we can only administrate what we see and seeing everything is not an easy job; so if we're looking at sec and one admin might be apparently focusing on sec and biased towards them, there may be another admin that same shift watching antags and speaking to them. As a player (having been one for a long ass time), you'll never see all the sides of the story, you only hear snippets. However, all feedback is appreciated and I can assure you this was discussed within our private channels.

    • Like 2
  2. 6 hours ago, xProlithium said:

    If the psychologist gives you weed for your crack addiction, would it help?

    Yes.

    1 hour ago, R1f73r said:

    Favorite and least favorite jobs on station?

    Favourite is probably Warden.

    Least favourite is probably scientist.

  3. 16 hours ago, MarsMond said:

    Should we make that as an option, but also making this true: "Central command would kill you if you implanted the disk into someone.", BSA incoming?

    Should we not discuss this in my thread get out now.

    16 hours ago, Trubus said:

    I feel like as long as it is command be ok. Especially nuke round, just delaying for one more chance for crew to get back 

    @MarsMond

    I think you don’t understand this threads purpose.

    15 hours ago, R1f73r said:

    not to turn this into a debate but to add surgury to the layers of things nuke ops have to do to get the nuke disk is just blech.

    I’m going to get my shank.

    14 hours ago, Trubus said:

    You're blech. *flexes*

    Get out.

  4. 2 hours ago, Malphystoh said:

    Didn't realize I was going to be graded by a jerk :c 

    This is not a question.

    2 hours ago, R1f73r said:

    Who’s the next mentor to be sacrificed?

    rb303

    1 hour ago, Bxil said:

    Now, I am sorry. I am just the resident Grammar Nazi™! Here, take this broom.

    Das ist keine Frage.

     

  5. 1 minute ago, Someonewithapen said:

    How many security officers does it take to change a lightbulb if they find a lightbulb box in maints?

    I've seen a security officer try to change a lightbulb and ends up throwing the new bulb against the wall and breaking it. I'm not hopeful. Probably one, because the rest can't do it.

  6. 2 minutes ago, Someonewithapen said:

    How many security officers does it take to change a light bulb?

    To get a lightbulb they would've had to have taken a limited resource, that's Petty Theft.

    You're nicked lass.

  7. Just now, PhantasmicDream said:

    If a train is traveling 124km an hour and and another leaves an hour later taveling at 177km an hour, how long would it take for me to get you out for a date?

    Churchy is going to be fuming.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use