Jump to content

Regen

Retired Admins
  • Posts

    1,741
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Regen

  1. Removing 1/3 of the weapons you can reliably use against a borg is ludicrous, this is a textbook example of "I ded pls nerf"

    Humans can be beaten to death just the same with a stun baton, except they have tons of other weaknesses, for instance getting peppersprayed in the face, harmbatoned, tasered, drugged, they are vulnerable to chemicals, they need to breathe, can break bones, need a suit to survive in a zero pressure environment etc.

    "But you can be permastunned by a flash!!"
    Well you can also be permastunned by a stunbaton, as well as it serving as a reliable blunt weapon to beat you to death with, it also can be recharged, whereas a flash is a non-rechargeable resource that has a finite amount of uses before being destroyed.

  2. 33 minutes ago, Birdtalon said:

    Can we allow users to delete their own posts for a short time after posting them as this forum seems to get a lot of double posts probably by mistake.

    I've added the ability for members to hide their own content, this means that normal people won't be able to see it, but staff will.

  3. 13 hours ago, Shadeykins said:

    Nerf ZN23X, they're amassing too much karma.

    Also I still need my precious wiki contributor tag you butte. <3

    The change not to double line on hitting enter is also massively appreciated, that was a much needed change.

    You mean the "new paragraph on enter" is a good thing, yes?

    I wasn't sure if it was something we wanted, it did break formatting on some old posts, but overal I think it helps people format their text better. You can also do shift+enter to get a linebreak

  4. Now that we've had the new forum for a while, I'd like to get everyones feedback on it.

    Is there anything that you are missing? 

    What do you like?

    What don't you like?

    Give us feedback here, so we can see about correcting any mistakes, and so we know where we did good, so we can continue doing good.

  5. 29 minutes ago, froz-t said:

    Yeah, with all due respect, that's honestly how it looked to a regular player like me, as well.

    Well, I can say that you're both wrong, we picked people for senior admins because of their ability and time on paradise, some people just didn't have what it takes to live up to the expectations of thw position, but a problem arised when more and more of the seniors became inactive while still holding their position. We didn't want to remove them, but they did begin to clog up the system.

    Our solution was the Senate, where 4 people work on a cycle, to ensure that people were active and to keep it small to get things moving along without having to wait a week for everyone to vote.

    So no, it's not about your loyalty, it's about your ability. 

  6. Just now, Love-To-Hug said:

    I think that is the LEAST the administration could do here. A little bit of courtesy.

    I'd love to, but it wasn't me who declined it, I can't decline it, I had no decision in declining it and I only heard the reason for declining it after it was declined.

     

    I'd love for people to get more feedback on why exactly things aren't being added, I'd also love for maintainers to take the time to consider if what's being proposed is something they'll even accept at the end BEFORE asking for changes, that way they're not wasting anyone's time on something that won't be added.
    Good example of this is Jedr's tank PR

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use