Siserith Posted April 29, 2015 Share Posted April 29, 2015 an anesthetic that works on one part of the body created in chem and can be injected or sprayed onto a part of the body numbing it. you will remain concious. but you will not be able to use the limb that has the anesthetic. numbs pain for surgery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFinnT Posted April 29, 2015 Share Posted April 29, 2015 as surgeon i don't care if my patient is screaming, it has no negative effects on the surgery. Maybe if thats changed, people would use anethetic to the topic, grate idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarvinMartian34 Posted April 30, 2015 Share Posted April 30, 2015 I honestly disagree with this. I think it would be easier to just be able to reuse one can of breathing anesthetics for multiple people that I can just slap on and they shut up, instead of having to go to the chemist after every surgery to get more local anesthetic, and then you accidentally inject in their right arm instead of their left arm, so you have to go back for more. And with local anesthetics, you would have to wait for it to take effect, and then wait for it to wear off, and if you take too long in the surgery and it wears off...well, you get the idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidchan Posted April 30, 2015 Share Posted April 30, 2015 Local anesthetic would be pretty nifty, would probably function about the same as pain killers though. Giving Borgs a needle/bottle that synthesizes this would be super useful though. Just don't put it in the Hypo stim, that would probably get it abused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coldflame Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 as surgeon i don't care if my patient is screaming, it has no negative effects on the surgery. Maybe if thats changed, people would use anethetic to the topic, grate idea On that subject, reason to use anaesthetic would be great and make sense, as opposed to the current situation where it's useless aside from RP, which is regrettably being neglected by the majority of the community (medium rp right guise?). "Your patient convulses violently, screaming, and prevents you from doing x"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johannhawk Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 as surgeon i don't care if my patient is screaming, it has no negative effects on the surgery. Maybe if thats changed, people would use anethetic to the topic, grate idea On that subject, reason to use anaesthetic would be great and make sense, as opposed to the current situation where it's useless aside from RP, which is regrettably being neglected by the majority of the community (medium rp right guise?). "Your patient convulses violently, screaming, and prevents you from doing x"? now we need a virus sympton for convulsions... well i can always dodge the anesthetic by using the sleep verb and go to sleep on my own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFinnT Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 as surgeon i don't care if my patient is screaming, it has no negative effects on the surgery. Maybe if thats changed, people would use anethetic to the topic, grate idea On that subject, reason to use anaesthetic would be great and make sense, as opposed to the current situation where it's useless aside from RP, which is regrettably being neglected by the majority of the community (medium rp right guise?). "Your patient convulses violently, screaming, and prevents you from doing x"? now we need a virus sympton for convulsions... well i can always dodge the anesthetic by using the sleep verb and go to sleep on my own. you woke up due to the pain in [bodypart]. your patient woke up and is moving to much to continue [action] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigercat2000 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 making surgery require anesthetic not only is pointless, but horrible ruins ghetto surgery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Fractal Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 You could just make it take way longer and introduce the possibility of failure. Ghetto surgery already does this so it would only nerf legit surgery done with no anesthesia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigercat2000 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 the entire point of legit surgery is that doctors that know what they are doing can save really badly injured people, there is no reason to nerf it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Fractal Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Theoretically, trained surgeons that know what they are doing would also know to not do open heart surgery or reset broken bones without some method of pain relief. Right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFinnT Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 well i did not thought about that. in medieval times they use to bite on stuff instead of anesthetics. mostly because they had none. that could be used in a gehto surgery but the again, surgery should not be a gamble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Fractal Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 well i did not thought about that.in medieval times they use to bite on stuff instead of anesthetics. mostly because they had none. that could be used in a gehto surgery but the again, surgery should not be a gamble. Hah! Oh my god yes! You could use your belt! In the cowboy movies they always bite either a bullet or a belt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts