Jump to content

AllStickySocks

Members
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AllStickySocks

  1. 5 hours ago, Spacemanspark said:

    what would you sensibly put into a snow-based chemical reaction that would prevent players from spamming the hell out of it with ease?

    Planning to make it so you need a lot of units for one snow tile. I plan to balance it around a fully teched up science department so those shitters don't stand a chance. Let's say a full bluespace beaker can cover a 4 by 4 room. Even if you filled a BoH with only beakers of snow you could still not cover a significant part of the station. Added to that the temperature needs to be low enough for snow to stay. As soon as someone decides to use a heater/thermostat that snow is gone.

  2. 21 hours ago, AllStickySocks said:

    image.png.74c8b7c6537681f13f3e18763c0d02e4.png
    Mission failed, we'll get 'em next time.

    New gameplan is making a snow chemistry recipe. You can splash this on the floor and if you splashed (insert amount here) units it creates snow.

    What about this? @KyetThe amount of units used per snow tile is what could keep it from being intrusive for other players.

  3. 20 hours ago, MarsMond said:

    Also, it may be less prone to abuse if making snow requires you to have the room cooled down before being able to get it placed, maybe it could just be made that if you have a room below the freezing point, throwing(splashing) a beaker with hot water to make snow. Usually requires colder temperatures for such quick snow creations, but that doesn't matter for this.

    I will have my team of expert coders look into this when making the PR

    • eyes 1
  4. Yeah I would say that the area they cover right now is too large and with my previous thermostat PR it is probably possible to cause some real damage if it was used that way. Still think the playerbase will be responsible with it though.

    2WRKPys.png

    3WvfcFy.png

    6j9TzvC.png

    8NHe7wV.png

    BkIP447.png

    Fxryh7K.png

    ixOKqk2.png

    np2vkIM.png

    UGLGVP2.png

    xVQkcza.png

  5. Very quick and simple. Is anyone against having snow machines year round instead of them being a Christmas only thing? I really want to make my drask paradise room and have snowball fights.

    • Like 4
  6. On 7/2/2021 at 2:57 AM, Kyet said:

    When I post a review of a PR that has a green check mark / marked as approved, I am saying that I am voting for that PR in my capacity as a head. Now it requires only (B) and (C) to be merged. I use my reviews to make my votes public. I have tried to encourage other heads/maints to adopt this system too, but most of them don't want to, partly as they dislike dealing with backlash on github. They don't like having to explain why they object to PRs, because they don't want to deal with PR authors messaging them "what do you mean, my code is terrible" or "what do you mean, you don't need another X in the game".

    Would you be opposed to some type of labeling system that allows heads to remain anonymous while still giving a sense of feedback about what is happening to a PR? Or is anonymity a deal breaker? @Kyet

  7. I wish the service areas of cargo and RnD were bigger. Like 2 counters, consoles and machines so more than one person can get serviced at once. That is my suggestion. Quicker service = shorter lines = less blocked halls.

  8. On 6/27/2020 at 9:57 PM, Happy Tim said:

    Let's face it, it's hard to keep calm when you finally meet your idol.

    Even for a Spoder. 

    That was a great prince round for me. The fans were the only thing that kept me going despite the numerous injuries.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use