Jump to content

Buford

Members
  • Posts

    183
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by Buford

  1. On 8/10/2017 at 11:32 PM, RiggyMiggy said:

    Dont know if this is really shitcurity or not but ill just tell thou story.

     

    So Samuel Todd was just helpin sec with the 3 durands and shit and one of them wanted a gygax which was for myself by the way (self protection etc you know) He said nah and proceeded to tase me and my friend, I got up. Had an axe, And started slamming it into his head, Swerving like a CSGO bunnyhopping pro. He died, I think once. Then he had trouble breathing due to how much I cleaved him (didnt mean to kill him just cripple) Then I got arrested for attempted murder, WHich I described was self-defense gone wrong. I get perma brigged which was fine and I broke a window, then space succed me out and I suffocated while saying over Radio "My last smoke." While I still die in space with a lit cig in my mouth. It was fun round though got to build shit.

     

    the shitcurity part was being tased over a gygax when there was a armed durand available which was kinda annoying a tad bit

    Sounds about the way I would want to go.

  2. 2 hours ago, FeiH said:

    It seems incredibly sketchy to me to both quote statistics while in the same breath say that statistics don't matter, especially when it comes to murder statistics. According to this news article from 2016, America is "63.7% non-Hispanic white, 12.2% black, 8.7% Hispanic white and 0.4% Hispanic black". 

    Unless Oklahoma's 7.7% black population is mostly criminals (highly unlikely, why would you even entertain that thought?) then there is something really fucking sketchy going on in the prison system.

    According to Wikipedia (I know, don't kill me for this) Black people make up 13% of the population but 40% of the incarcerated population. Although white people aren't far behind at 39%, they make up 64% of the population of the US. What does this mean? It means that black people, on average, are more likely to be put into prison for whatever reason. Saying that "Blacks kill more people than whites, so that's why they're in prison more" is reductive and ignores things like the population disparity (white people are more likely to be victims of crime because they're the majority) and the recent history of racism in America.

    Spotting racism isn't as easy as someone throwing up nazi salutes, wearing nazi armbands, or calling black people genetically inferior even though a lot of people seem to have trouble seeing even THAT nowadays. There are things that may seem inconsequential that are in fact symptoms of racism deeply ingrained in our culture, such as equating African-American Vernacular English with being stupid or uneducated and upholding posh british accents as signs of nobility and intelligence. Things like the Black Welfare Queen caricature despite the biggest beneficiaries of food stamps and welfare being working-class white people, or how the word "Gypsy" was a slur against Romani people in Italy because of the mistaken assumption that they were from Egypt. if you want even more obscure and borderline-tinfoil hat levels of cryptoracism, the trope of villains having big noses can be traced back to antisemitic caricatures of the big-nosed "greedy jew" stereotype wringing his hands.

    It's also weird how you put in the NBA as something positive about black people, because black people love basketball I guess???

    In the end, we're all racist to some degree. What separates innocent racism from actual harmful racism is what you do when people point your racism out: do you take this into consideration and make an effort to learn, or do you immediately go on the defensive and say "that's not racist!" before doubling down on your racist bias?

    I didn't use that statistic as the sole reason why they are in prison more. That statistic verified that there was a minority of racists by implying that black people statistically kill more whites then whites kill blacks. It's dangerous in the black ghetto's for whites to enter simply because a lot of them hate white people. Statistically speaking blacks hold the race with the highest crime rate http://prntscr.com/gcf06a (This was an analysis in 2009). However a very slim amount of these crimes could be just black people insulting police officers excessively which happens frequently but not illegal and police officers reacting by framing them and or charging them with something that they didn't do.

    Statistics for crime rates are gathered from police records. In the court of law there must be without reasonable doubt someone being proven guilty before sentenced especially when it comes to murder. Most of the time police officers wouldn't and most likely couldn't frame black people on murder as it's usually something along the lines of drugs. So the murder statistics are almost 100% valid. Detroit holds the record for the highest population in black people in it's city. Detroit is a dump.

    HOWEVER, I will say this again I don't like it when people use the legit statistics to attack the entire race, devalue, or stir up hate towards black people. Despite the statistics there are a lot of black people with good moral character and shouldn't be overburdened by negative statistics on there race.

    Also the idea that there is racism ingrained in our culture from your example of ebonics being looked at as stupid. It isn't, it's look at as "Cool" or trendy. Look at rap for instance a lot of people listen to it. Also a lot of white people primarily in highschool and around my age who grew up being exposed to a lot of rap use ebonic slang terms picked up by rap or trended by black people on youtube, facebook, or another media outlook. I see it on my facebook all the time haha. I'm opposed to the whole rap culture but I still sometimes use the terms that's how bad it is one of the most frequent being "Hella".

    However the social analysis on the British accent is pretty accurate considering that in movies or anime cartoons there is on occasion a voice actor or actor with a British accent taking the role of someone who is rich or in a reputable position such as a professor or whatnot.

    Also yes well fare is commonly associated with black people. However having an ignorant idea about a group of people such as an entire race doesn't make them racist or oppose of them. Most people view mental hospitals and patients as a fucked up place along with fucked up people. This view was generated by movie's and a list of other things but that doesn't imply that the people who have this ignorant view of them hate them or oppose to them.

    Well fare is also associated with white people or "White trash" that live in trailer parks and are dumb/uneducated.

    Concerning your CIA mention. The link you sent described united states regime change, not the resources and organizations involved in it.

    Also the last part of what you said. Yes in all humans lies some sort of bias based on what we have been exposed to since birth. This bias isn't only narrowed down to racism.

    • Like 1
    • stunbaton 1
  3. Also I copied and pasted what I said on discord to other people on the topic without copying and pasting what they said that's kinda why it looks broken up and not make any sense.

    There were two topics that were mentioned on discord the CIA and BLM that's why there are like two topics merged together.

    I just wanted to share what I said on discord it isn't intended for debate.

    • stunbaton 1
  4. 5 hours ago, Streaky Haddock said:

    I find it kinda hard to debate this, since I don't know what the point of this particular debate is, and it seems to come down to you being bwoinked by admins for torturing people in your custody because the CIA do it. 

    Also claiming the Black Lives Matter movement is illogical by saying that 50% of the country isn't racist demonstrates staggeringly shallow thinking, because that means (by that logic) that 50% of the country IS racist. You shouldn't use guesswork when coming up with statistics, because official statisticians do the guesswork for us. Abandoning this train of logic for one that I can better grasp:

    The BLM movement isn't about the NBA, black history celebrations or martin luther king day. Its about the systemic abuse of black people by the police force of which there is mountains of evidence in the form of prison statistics and constant news coverage of unarmed black people getting shot. The most chilling case happened a couple months ago where a man was shot multiple times in his car while his wife and son sat along side him by an officer whilst mentioning the entire time that he was being compliant and trying to reassure the /officer stopping him/. 

    I said under 50% of the country isn't racist (I would say the ratio is far less then 50% but cannot be proven) and I used the NBA, black history month, and all the other positive mentions specifically for black people to validate this considering that you cannot gain accurate statistics on who's racist or not because being "Racist" is a largely opinionated matter. For instance if someone has a lot of black friends but constantly and generally talks bad about black people using negative racial terms. There is a dilemma on whether that person is racist or not. If this person was to enter a national poll on how many racists there are in the country he'd most likely vote not racist along with the majority of the country leading to inaccurate statistics.

    Concerning your statistics of police brutality on black people.

    https://prnt.sc/gbi4j2

    That's the reason why there are more black people in prison according to statistics as well the police shootings.

    However if you read carefully I do think the people and youtube videos that go against the black lives matter movement are almost equally stupid. Considering that a lot of these people

    I would label as racist simply because there argument against the BLM movement points out statistics against black people such as the screenshot I showed and no valid argument against

    the BLM movement itself. They just attack the races morals and culture using statistics in which I don't agree with.

    I don't like people using statistics to attack black people because that leaves a negative bias towards them and leaves no room for the good black people to shine.

    Basically people in BLM and any other ant-racist activists group should not exist simply because there are a minority of racists in the country.

    People that go against BLM should target BLM's logic and not black people.

    • stunbaton 1
  5. Yea keep in mind this thread is in the unban requests declined section I posted it there on accident.

    This is something I was replying to someone on discord about when he asked. I also didn't use google to look up these facts I've known about them for the longest time.

    Political correctness is in no way shape or form used by our current president. The BLM movement is illogical considering that under 50% of the US is not racist. Leaving the BLM with no point in existing. These statistics are a complete educated guess based on my analysis of things going on with race now a days. We have black history month, black entertainment television, martin luther king day, black only scholarships and clubs, the majority of the NBA is black and making millions. However the people that protest against the black lives matter movement are almost equally illogical other then there statistics which are based on fact for instance there are far more black on white murders then white on black murders. However aknowledging the true statistics isn't a good idea because it leads to a bias against black people giving no room for the good eggs to shine. My opinion on the BLM is that it shouldn't exist based on the assumption that I have made due to all of that, that under 50% of the US is racist. A very slim minority speaking. The KKK is dying and the Arian nation only has like 4-8 people in each HQ. You cannot gather accurate statistics on racism because if you make a national poll being a "Racist" is largely based on opinion that questions the moral values of the individual regarding race.

    When you generalize a race or a group of people by statistics it leave almost absolutly no room to aknowledge the good eggs and if the statistics show mostly good the bad eggs.

    This is Buford Prescot self educated deep thinker haha.

    I say that the people that protest against the BLM movement are illogical because they try to imply by statistics that black culture is overun by immoral rap, violence, and gang banging. Which statistically is true but should NOT be used as a tool to attack the entire race considering that there are a lot of good people that are black and should be valued like barack obama and morgan freeman.

    Response to someone claiming they are a terrorist group equivelant to the Neo Nazi's and all that:

    All of them are a hybrid between different groups of people. The violent protesters and the people that try to use there form of "Logic" which isn't logic it's completely stupid to communicate that there is a lot of racism in the US and they strive for equality which is a complete dellusion. Most of these people are the BLM self proclaimed leaders who primarly appear on television interviews and Coed activist groups.

    They are composed of there self proclaimed leaders and coed activist groups*

    They aren't a terrorist group as a whole.

    Response to acclaimed CIA manipulating statistics due to racism or an agenda:

    I know nothing of BAMN. But the CIA in no way shape or form manipulates statistics. Most of these statistics were taken during the period of 1995-2017 a time where racism was and is severily declining by taking the crime statistics by police records and documents on crime.

    CIA is a covert group that sends agents to area's to convert the enemy into becoming double agents for them. Or to train rebel groups against government. They have in the past worked with some shady people in the mafia and drug lords. There whole purpose is to disrupt and manipulate groups and governments while trying to keep a low profile and to minimize the blame of the actions on the United States.

    Some individual people of the enemy in authority positions by bribing them, indoctorinating them, finding people that disagree with there government and organization I ment.

    Response to someone commenting about the CIA supporting drug lords in south america:

    They used to but ever since nixon declared a war on drugs operations of the CIA have been severely minimized when it comes to manipulating and bribing drug lords.

    During the cold war when the soviets attempted to invade afghanistan the CIA funded and trained there militia along with Bin Laden being one of them since he had a major influence on the population. They gave them gear and they succesfully defeated the russians.

    Later on Bin Laden fucked the US over so they killed him.

    Yea don't ask me how I know this LOL.

    In game playing HoS as Buford Prescot I made a couple fuckups as a basic security guard by using what the CIA coined "Enhanced Interrogation Methods" which was basically an innocent term for torture.

    I even said were going to use "Enhanced Interrogation Methods"

    Kinda funny lol.

    Then I got boinked and stopped.

    The CIA's method of torture was water boarding, stress positions, depriving them of sleep.

    Things like that.

    Response to someone commenting that the CIA is dangerous and a threat to democracy:

    When it comes to covert spy operations every government has them. During the cold war russia had the KGB. China today has the ministry of state security. Even Afghanistan when they killed Bin Laden they built a government based on the principles of the US to gain a stronger foothold there covert spy operations department is called National Directorate of Security.

    Well almost every country has them but there effectiveness varies.

    They CIA does answer to certain points of authority. Basically they have blood feuds with congress similar to the blood feuds and disagreements between central command, magistrate, captain, and the HoS.

    The*

    The CIA is basically a department that feuds with congress and tries to hide things from them or cover up/manipulate them while congress makes the ultimate decision on the fate of certain members of the CIA or the way they operate they are the equivalant to central command. The president is the equivelant to the captain. Also, magistrate and NT rep can't accurately be implemented into this analogy.

    • stunbaton 9
    • clown 2
    • explodyparrot 2
  6. On 8/15/2017 at 6:55 PM, Saul Argon said:

     

    I was the last shadowling, one thrall away from ascending and "winning" the round. I was having a lot of fun and was just waiting on one last guy to nab in order to ascend. I see a guy in a geneticist uniform, I stun him. Cuff him, but as soon as I go to thrall him. He sets himself on fire, killing me. The guy got bwoinked by another admin, and the guy said he was "baiting to get the slings to come thrall". Thus, he was promptly jobanned from geneticist for validhunting. 

    LOOOL. That sounds like a pretty traumatic story.

  7. 1 minute ago, Biabri said:

    It's the security records machines that allow you change people to arrest.

    Yea just found the other one at the booth overlooking the brig lobby. Thought there was only one in the wardens office haha.

  8. 8 hours ago, ZN23X said:

    This should all be handled in character. Sometimes criminals just argue thier sentences even if they know exactly why and how long they should be in for. Them argueing or questioning a sentence is just a means to create conflict and dialogue IC. You shouldn't be using LOOC to explain your IC actions. Tell them thier charges and tell them if they have a problem with it tell them to contact internal affairs. You also shouldn't be saying things IC like "Sorry I had the wrong intent set" or "???". THAT is what LOOC is used for, and even then if you accidentally harm intent someone you can find a way to play it off IC like "I was trying to swat a bug flying around your head" or something and instead of saying "???" you can say "I'm confused" or emote that you look confused.

    I like the thing with having wiki pages pulled up, it is helpful for newer players and I'd also add the Contraband page to that list, but once you are experienced at sec you don't even need the wiki anymore except maybe for a quick refresher if you have a mental lapse or something. This could really be said for any job on the station, and there are plenty of aspects of every job that you will learn through experience that the wiki can never teach you.

    It's also important for the Warden and HOS to be knowledgeable with all aspects of security. Last night when I was HOS and you were Warden you were under the belief that only the HOS could set arrest records. I was absolutely stunned that someone who plays HOS as frequently as you didn't know anyone with a SEC HUD or access to a security records console could do this. Also when a cloned officer asked you for a mindshield you told them you don't have them. The Warden (and HOS) should know the contents of the armory and when/how to use everything in there. You also asked my approval for brigging several people. While the HOS CAN help with this, it is both the wardens job and they have full authority to handle all of the aspects of processing and brigging criminals without permission. It can help to allow others to play these roles and observe them as one of thier subordinates to see how different people handle the job. I learned more about sec playing Brig Doc than any other role because there are many times you can just sit back and watch without being flooded with all the responsibilities, noise, and stress of more important roles.

    I really hope you morso view this as a friend trying to help a friend rather than a personal attack but I can understand if you take it that way.

    Sorry ☹

    22 hours ago, Valkyrie said:

    Just earlier today, I saw you showing better knowledge of Space Law than whoever was playing HoS that round. 

    (Valkyrie wasn't referring to you) On further note.

    I don't take offense to this. Yes I know security can set arrest warrants via there sec HUD but I didn't know they could do that from long distances with the terminal in the wardens office (Unless there is another terminal elsewhere) simply because they don't have access to the doors. I'm not sure if you encountered me enough to know but during my warden days I placed numerous arrest warrants out from the console so the impression that I thought that only HoS could set them is inaccurate. Also I understand the reason why you made that accusation was because I informed and accused  you of placing an arrest warrant on someone without jotting anything down because the suspect stated he had it on him for being accused of stealing a cat) and that I let him go. (Which you ordered numerous amounts of to line your HoS office which was uh pretty awesome tbh). You also stated that you weren't the one that issued the arrest warrant. I wasn't trying to imply that idea that I thought that only HoS could set them I assumed based on the method of deductive reasoning that you were the one that placed it. When I started playing security I started off as a basic security guard for around 75 hours in game time, and warden 50 hours in game time, now I play as HoS often. Also There have only been two incidents where I accidentally had harm intent on on accident the rest of the times were intentional like months ago when I first started playing security and I usually RP'd it as "I'm sorry I set my baton to harm" as it wouldn't be logical to say "Oh I was aiming for a fly." as in like how in reality would you "accidentally" harm someone with a baton considering that in game mechanics allow you to hit someone over and over again without doing damage therefor the baton has to be roleplayed (In my opinion) as something that can have two modes lethal and non lethal which is another grey area.

    Also there are small details that most security miss in space law, SoP, legal SoP, and in the contrabands page. I want my sentences and judgements to be almost 100% in line with all of that. For instance most people don't know that if you use 2 or more class C contraband and up or use one class C contraband and up to commit a major crime labeled in space law it labels the individual as EoC.

    Also the wiki is so massive I'm sure you can't know all of these by heart regardless I know quite a bit by heart but once again you gotta read the fine print and the details to know what you can and cannot do precisely.

    If you do things by memory or by your head then you are bound to fuck up. 

    I also see at least 1/3 of the security force leaving them cuffed inside there cells which is a violation of SoP and I have to constantly correct them. Most officers don't know that in legal SoP you are allowed to remove there headset given certain circumstances.

    As far as the screenshots in looc I do not see a problem with it considering the wiki page is looc material and can be used to correct those officers who do not know anything about what they are doing hardly do I have to use it on prisoners that question me.

    "This could really be said for any job on the station, and there are plenty of aspects of every job that you will learn through experience that the wiki can never teach you."

    Concerning that quote I'm sure almost every aspect of security is governed by the contents of the wiki. Accept those concerning moral dilemma's such as the whole self defense which is stated in space law as "generally pushing and disarming" (Didn't even have to look at wiki for that.) in which if there is an antagonist trying to kill someone and the crew kills the antagonist even though it's against space law I generally let it slide as do most people in authority positions and in security.

     

    I never said I "Dont have a mindshield" I believe you might be confusing me with someone else because more frequently I'm the one to remind officers to mindshield permabrig prisoners and all that or do it myself.

    Also I only asked for your approval for people that are in line for permabrig or commit and exceptional crime and up because I can't make those decisions unless I'm acting HoS.

    Keep in mind I have played higher positions of Police (Or Police like figures) on different games and have started organizations based on police positions.

    My biggest one being over 400 members.

    However most of them were on Gmod and considering Gmod isn't as serious as SS13 I don't consider them applicable.

    The game I do see as applicable is face of mankind.

    I was a rank 4 LED (Detective) and my voice held a lot of weight and had a stronger influence then a good chunk of the ranks high command and all that.

    R7 (Commissioner of law enforcement department) is only achievable by being set there by game masters and I was offered that position once but declined.

    LED at my era had around 8-35 people on at any given time with the overall player base being hundreds and yes there was a set of laws that each LED officer had to follow along with RoE (Rules of engagement) and WSA (Warn stun arrest procedure). The list of laws is also ten times more massive then on paradise station.

    My favorite being 8.2 which basically states that if you insult an LED officer you can get arrested haha.

    I've micromanaged shit in other games and have gotten things done in an efficient matter that lessens the headache on this game where the cop like figure is corporate security consisting of 5-11 people.

    Anyways thanks for the help Tetris!

     

    Edit: You said mindshield! Whoops yea I know there are mindshields in the HoS locker and in the wardens personal armory. Not sure why you accused me of saying this maybe I stated that "The officer doesn't have a mindshield" probably a miscommuncation.

  9. Anyways this is not a thread about my affairs with other players. I just used it as an example. If I wanted it to be about that it'd be in the players complaint section which I don't care to post in.

    When it comes down to it Metagrudge needs to be a stand alone rule that defines itself in a way that people can understand the difference between legit IC bias and Metagrudge and to clarify what would count as metagrudge.

    Metagrudge is mentioned once in the rule list basically as a term within one of the definitions of a rule. It isn't a standalone rule nor one of the highlighted definitions of a rule it is a solo word within a sentence.

    This leaves room for MAJOR grey area's. 

  10. 42 minutes ago, Ty Omaha said:

    Right, but his reason to do so was to prevent the guy from escaping. Why did you pepper spray the guy?

    http://prntscr.com/g93alv

    This incident that happened luigi was not in game during the round so he had nothing to do with it.

    Also I could understand a taze and one time baton to get cuffs on a person. But like stunning him once.. Then stunning him another 5 times in a row without attempting to cuff him is not to prevent the guy from escaping. 

  11. 31 minutes ago, Ty Omaha said:

    If I recall correctly the guy in the chair was attempting to unbuckle/uncuff which was why the officer was stunbatonning them

    You weren't there when it happened also sorry I usually type out things and don't reread them.

    What I meant to say was that he was in one of the cells and attempted to escape while the timer was being set so an officer stunned him with the baton instead of re-cuffing him and buckling him back on the Bed he continued to hit him over and over again (Non lethally of course). I only pepper sprayed the person once.

  12. 8 minutes ago, DayZ Me Trolling said:

    I genuinely have no idea what you're talking about considering I barely talk to you IC since half the time I'm off doing other stuff. To be clear, whenever I do make a negative remark IC  (IC is the golden word here) towards anyone that makes a mistake in security it's because something seriously bad came out of the really bad mistake. If you think I have any sort of personal bias towards you or your character, you're mistaken. If I can frank I really don't care what you do or play and have no distaste for you, however if your character fucks up seriously in front of mine he's going to get called out, just like any other character would.

     

    Also not sure why you didn't clarify this already however when you /ICly/ said "You're gonna go become a doctor now" my characters response was along the lines of "Good, stay there"   

    And again, to be crystal clear I don't have any distaste for you or your character, whatever my character does in regards to role play doesn't reflect my actual viewpoint nor does it immediately mean I hate you or anyone else I have a negative interaction with IC. 

    Yea I recall you saying "Good stay there" I thought you implied that I should never be security again.

    Great.

    Maybe it was a miscommunication. I know you have nothing to do with the female NT rep

  13. 9 minutes ago, DayZ Me Trolling said:

    I see, well it probably doesn't help that you also threw in a couple of other names on OOC yesterday, including my own because you were fired IC. I can't take the "personal bias" thing too serious myself since you even called myself out on it when in reality that was literally our first time interacting negatively IC. I can't comment on the NT Rep as I have no idea who she is or what her side of the story is, but I can safely suggest that there's a possibility that generally there is no personal bias. 

    No it wasn't. I remember you clear as day when I was just starting security after spending quite a bit of time as doctor. After the third fuckup you were on my ass making negative comments IC whenever you had a valid reason to do so.

    Also I'm going to quote you. After I got demoted and I said I'm going doctor you said "Good never go security again" or something along those lines.

    I've been doing a great job as HoS even got a compliment from Goobina or Bloobina (One of the two can't remember) said I would make a good captain.

    I'm pretty decent in security now and your just going to have to let it in the past.

  14. Just now, DayZ Me Trolling said:

    May you have considered that some of this may not be "personal bias/metagrudging" and simply an overzealous NT rep or a chain of events that lead to some sort of IC confrontation? 

    I was gone for two weeks. Just came back and it was my second day playing after being gone for so long when she became NT rep that round and stated at the beginning of the shift "I've heard bad things about you, I'll keep an eye on you." Also I stated that I recall seeing her in processing often. Then she stated "I've been gone for a couple days there are many -insert name here- on the station." It was probably the wrong -insert name here-. Considering I've been gone for 2 weeks IRL time.  If her statement is true then that was her first encounter of seeing me in 2 weeks. She began shit talking me to the captain since the beginning of the round with little or no IC reason (the captain told me). 

    I know her name I just refuse to mention it.

  15. 37 minutes ago, Valkyrie said:

    That's pretty unreasonable. I do remember a time where you made a TON of mistakes as a security member, but you were new, and everyone starts somewhere. That was months ago, though. Just earlier today, I saw you showing better knowledge of Space Law than whoever was playing HoS that round. It's clear that you've gotten a lot more experience and became less prone to mistakes.

    Can't say what the best thing to do in this situation would be besides ahelp if you think you're being metagrudged.

    It was clear metagrudge considering this is my 3rd day playing after being gone for 2 weeks.

    Also I'm not quite sure if it would have helped because of the grey area within the boundaries of valid IC bias and against the rule metagrudge. That's why I believe this rule should be more clearly defined and enforced.

    Also my word doesn't hold any weight considering that most of these people have been playing for years.

  16. Also metagrudge isn't a clearly defined or a ruleset alone. It's under the context of "Maintaining a respectful environment"

    https://prnt.sc/g8wrk9

    Metagrudge is only mentioned in the rule list in that screenshot. There are also several grey area's regarding the whole slight in context bias being allowed to cross shifts I believe that metagrudge should be a standalone rule with a clear definition of what it is. As well maybe implement what is stated under the metagrudge rule.

     

    Yea someone went NT Rep and at the start of the round she said "I've heard bad things about you Buford I'll be keeping an eye on you."

    The captain then told me that she's been complaining about me all shift saying "I'm a worthless piece of shit."

    Eventually he got annoyed of her complaining to where he did demote me. Captain allowed me to stay with him and we kinda started a party in AI core haha.

     

    The only bad thing I did that shift was pepper spray someone for giving me excessive mouth haha. Got brigged for 5 minutes for battery but not demoted but she continued to complain before and after that incident until I did get demoted.

    Another officer non lethally stunsticked someone like 6 times during that same shift in processing but nothing was done about him. Combined with that we were having trouble with the vamps and she basically said according to the captain "Security is doing a shit job at handling the vamps it's Bufords fault" or something along those lines as well blaming the incident of the new officer on me and not penalizing him.

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use