User:Sirryan2002/WikiStandards

From Paradise Station Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please keep in mind that these are in no way official and are instead my(Sirryan2002) take on the standards our wiki should follow

What Makes a Good Article

  • Introduction
    • Context
  • Structure
    • Beginning
    • Middle
    • End
  • Uniformity
    • Template Usage
  • Utility
  • Media
  • Prose
    • Grammar
    • Rhetoric
    • Literary Elements
  • Look
  • Code



Grade GA (Good Article)
A Good Article:

  1. Well written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
    2. and it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias;
    3. and it complies with the Paradise manual of style guidelines.
  2. Original:
    1. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
    2. It does not steal articles from other wikis(inspiration/modeling from other wikis, however, is encouraged)
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic;
    2. and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
  4. Informative
    1. It provides all necessary information;
    2. and provides references to other articles
  5. Illustrated
    1. Includes high quality images/gifs of the subject matter;
    2. and Includes Images for Example/Hypothetical situations that complement the article if necessary;
    3. and has Diagrams/Marked-Up/annotated Images where needed too help the reader better understand the subject matter
  6. Standardized
    1. Pages are uniform with other pages of its type;
    2. and relevant and proper Templates are used.
  7. Enjoyable
    1. Minor and Light humor are included;
    2. and formatting is easy on the eyes.

Revising Articles

When an Article Requires a Rewrite

Occasionally, an article is so outdated, messy, or overall badly written that it requires a general/complete rewrite. This is often due to multiple authors contributing in ways that deviate from the original/main theme/style/purpose of the page or continue a trend of low-quality edits. This need for a rewrite is not an insult to the contributors but a means of improving the article and condensing all of that knowledge into better digestible and informative articles.

So when does an Article need a rewrite?

  1. The Article does not inform the reader about the matter being discussed
  2. The Article does not have any formatting and is a wall of text
  3. The flow of the article is not logical and requires a lot of jumping around in order to read it.
  4. The article is very outdated